This is the best dragon deck in the game. I put in a zilliax, snip snap, and two faceless corruptors. Took out a nourish, howl and one wyrm. Faceless is too broken not to include in the deck.
Keep in mind: right now this deck is 13 dragons, 1 Frizz, and 16 spells. So minion-wise SIN has ~6 fantastic targets from big dragons (42%), ~7 good targets from mid-sized dragons (50%), and Frizz (7%). Every minion you add beyond that is increasing the risk of a bad roll from SIN plus the Grapplesniper will only summon a dragon ~43% of the time yet draw your opponent a card 100% of the time. You do have a chance of summoning a free Deathwing, Alex, or Evasive which I imagine feels great, but most of the other dragons only have 3-4 attack and won’t have game-swinging effect. I think on average it probably loses more games than it wins; otherwise Kibler would have put it in. 😉
*Percentages actually slightly better than that when you account for mulligans, but I have a headache and don’t even want to think about how to do that math right now.
/rating_1_half.png)
/rating_2_off.png)
This is the best dragon deck in the game. I put in a zilliax, snip snap, and two faceless corruptors. Took out a nourish, howl and one wyrm. Faceless is too broken not to include in the deck.
“strength in numbers” card has a lot synergy with those dragons!
how about adding “Utgarde Grapplesniper” to the deck?
Keep in mind: right now this deck is 13 dragons, 1 Frizz, and 16 spells. So minion-wise SIN has ~6 fantastic targets from big dragons (42%), ~7 good targets from mid-sized dragons (50%), and Frizz (7%). Every minion you add beyond that is increasing the risk of a bad roll from SIN plus the Grapplesniper will only summon a dragon ~43% of the time yet draw your opponent a card 100% of the time. You do have a chance of summoning a free Deathwing, Alex, or Evasive which I imagine feels great, but most of the other dragons only have 3-4 attack and won’t have game-swinging effect. I think on average it probably loses more games than it wins; otherwise Kibler would have put it in. 😉
*Percentages actually slightly better than that when you account for mulligans, but I have a headache and don’t even want to think about how to do that math right now.