I mean..After turn 4, you don’t mind not seeing 1-drops.
It could definately win. Keleseth was used in Tempo Rogue as…Tempo. 1-Drops weren’t really what made the deck powerful, although they were a good addition.

Not really but the novelty is similar, I’ll give you that. Mind Control is extremely better though in many ways.

This is busted. Good thing is any class can basically run this with an efficient way to trigger its deathrattle the same turn.

I don’t think he needs extra help in a Rogue deck. Honestly it feels like a Miracle card. You could slap a black background and call it a Rogue Legendary ’cause I doubt other classes will use him.

I’m looking forward to a meta-deck that proves you wrong.

This card could potentially work with a Deathrattle card that recruits a minion, similar to Grizzled Guardian but taylored to work with this card.
The obvious problem is that by the time you play Daskfaller Avian or recruit her through cards like Oaken Summons, you’ve already played your first card so her ability is useless until your next turn.
Even worst, you’ve actually allowed your opponent to use her ability before you, play a card for 0 cost and they probably removed her by the time your turn comes up.
This would have been fine if you could use her ability immediately after she’s summoned (I can’t really think of the appropriate wording for that), but this way it’s pretty bad. Maybe “The first card each player plays each turn, other than this card, costs 0 mana” would have made this card work. Actually, it would have been a decent card that unlocks a couple of combo decks. It would have been exceptional in Malygos Druid.

I’m not saying it can revive an archetype that was never alive to begin with, but there is some synergy to note with Marsh Queen.
A deck filled with 1-drops you can trade easily for control of the board (thanks to this guy) and soon after a deck filled with 1-drop “Draw a card” Rush minions isn’t something to laugh at.

It’s a good, interesting thing and all, but it feels somewhat strange. Shaman’s going to be the only class with two DKs.

Isn’t that Syndrome’s “If anyone’s super…noone will be.”

This thread went downhill so quickly..
People, ZableFahr has a good point. Blizzard knows how to milk the cash out of the community through deals like the bundles and this 70-pack deal. That’s by no means a bad thing. As Stonekeep pointed out, it’s a bussiness. The end-goal is to make cash. And these deals are pretty fair, considering. Since they allow the choice of a free-to-play mentality, I don’t think there’s anything to critisize Blizzard for except maybe for the overall price of the packs outside of such deals (they ain’t cheap, I think we can all agree with that).

However, I do want to adress something “Ontark” said. ” if you don’t want to pay for development instead of leeching off the players who care to see future expansions. I would have to say your excuse not to pay is so very ridiculous that i would just label you a cheap person.”
First off, “excuse”? Man, I can’t wrap my mind around that. I really hope you messed up your words there, ’cause noone needs an “excuse” as you put it to not pay for a “free game”. What do you think we are, investors? Or are we supposed to show gratitude for a company offering us their products like that? Micro-transactions are fair game because it’s anyone’s choice to engage in them. It’s a free game, so noone should feel like a “cheap person” for not wanting to toss in a 20/ 50 whenever an expansion is anounced. The very concept is ridicoulus.

Witchwood seems like the perfect chance to introduce the “Worgen” tag, with all these new Worgen-inspired minions. Seems like they won’t go through with it though.

x’D After the next expansion? Who knows what will happen then? Warlock could be crap for all we know.

Not really. You see, Blizzard won’t anounce any other nerfs for a good while after these ones. That’s how nerfs work, you collect all the neccesary changes and anounce them together. The last nerfs were on Warrior’s Fiery War Axe, for example.
There won’t be any nerfs on Cube Warlock, the only way to restrict his power level is either to send Doomguard to the Hall of Fame or introduce new cards with the next expansion that puts him out of competition.

I’m playing Cubelock, but I’ve scratched a Spellbreaker and Prince Taldaram for a couple of Tar Creepers. Aggro Paladin is extremely easy dude, think about this: they’re very reliant on Call of Arms which is basically a set up for Defile. And by turn 7 they concede.

Face Hunter and Spell Hunter are not the same type of decks. And you did say Face Hunter, so that’s a no point. Face Hunter isn’t just aggro, it’s face. Generally the most auto-piloted genre of gameplay.

Well, don’t get me wrong: it’s a powerful deck. But calling it cancer? x’D Yo, Gadgetzan Pirate Warrior’s looking for you and he’s angry.

People, we playing the same game? Cubelock’s not low skill, it’s above average. Low skill are decks that you can auto-pilot. Believe me, there’s no real argument there.
As for the high roll…the deck has like two options for manari and luckey. Are you really saying that’s a high roll? It’s ridicoulus, there’s barely any rng factor in this. The most “rng”-influenced warlock gets is whether you’ll get Doomguard or Voidlord and usually both are fine in most situations. Come on, get real.

You’re wrong though. Firstly the fact people forget to attack with patches means they forget to attack with patches. You don’t draw any other conclusion here or you’d be blamed with generalizing.
Secondly, you can’t ignore actual “research” for lack of a better word. Yes 1 damage matters and it matters a lot.
As for drawing patches. Yes, it’s a big set back.

Privliged standard pleb. X”’D

You know what? I totally agree. I forsee an Expansion in the near future that probably puts Cubelock in check, or maybe one of its key cards moving to the Hall of Fame. February’s gonna be Cubelock Month.