Never really looked at Windfury Harpy but boy, that old piece of art is a good one.

Only really mad about Succubus … that’s a classic Demon archetype throughout literature, films, comics … removing it due to gender issues … meeh.

thx!

I can’t remember how it was done in older expansions (nor IF it was done)… when I purchase both bundles, do I get 1 or 2 random golden legendaries?

I don’t see how this isn’t possible with the concept of x-class cards (or other to-be-defined concepts)!?

Agreed that it’s not possible (now; pretty sure clever designers can come up with good solutions) to ‘shade’ the cards due to the lack of mana symbols. For example, they could do a 2-class card that can be played by one of the classes only if certain conditions are fullfilled. That way, a Hunter Druid Beast could feel more hunter-ish, but still be played by the Druid class. Same for spells.

And nobody said it would be easy. That’s why some people get paid for doing it. 😉

Makes no sense for longtime players. come to think of it, it doesn’t really matter for new ones either. 😉

That is a good teaser. It teases me very well. 🙂

In the most prominent card game, MtG, there is the ‘color pie’ concept, which indicates strengths, weaknesses and characteristics of the Magic colors (roughly the same as HS classes).

One of the coolest aspects of MtG is how the lines between the colors (and their combinations, which manifest in multicolored cards) are getting twisted, tweaked and blurred depending on the games’ expansions settings.

HS could borrow many of those concepts and has a plethora of possibilities. On of the most obvious is the ‘multicolor’ aspect, which they briefly touched in MSoG with the triclass cards (btw I never understood why those are listed under the neutral cards and not under the classes that could use them).

All in all, it is a good thing to remove ‘blurring’ class identity cards from the evergreen sets. Those cards should only be available for a certain time or ‘set flavor’. So, Mulch is okay, Naturalize isn’t.

My thoughts exactly. 😉

Is that craftable-thing confirmed? Because, well, they even don’t have a rarity symbol. This means Blizzard must define a rarity for those cards … sounds strange.

But keeping them ‘wild-free’ seems odd, too. 😉

If I save up classic packs that I earn before the patch, do I have a chance to get new cards when I open them after the patch is applied?

In other words: When is the content of a pack defined; the moment I obtain it or the moment I open it?

Yupp, strange move. And yeah, the cards are really bad (Whitemane might be an exception) – Blizz might as well give you the dust for them directly when you open them in a Classic pack. 😉

Come to think of it for a few seconds, I think that the cards simply will be listed under the Wild collection. New players should see them there. But idk how the unlocking would work …

That is a good question.

Druid’s first listed strength: mana generation.

Nice sense of humour. 🙂

I would swap the positions of Dr. Morrigan and the Boomzooka – met the first a view times, but didn’t see the second a single time.

Besides that, great article.

I never really understood why they canceled that ‘Murloc Promo’ – even if Old Murk-Eye is only playable in Wild.

Cool. Thanks!

Nice! But … Blizzard doesn’t want my money …

Heads up! Something went wrong. Select another payment method or try again later.

I guess I’ll try again later, then (already used different payment method).

Oh mys … Maybe she doesn’t get played that much. 😉 Annoying problem nonetheless, hope you’ll be able to fix it.