The picture in the front show 5/5 stats, but here it’s 5/6 stats?
The 5/5 rush for 5 is already good, and it’s another 5 attack at random.
Dealing 5+5 for 5 mana is very good I think. Could trade into 2 minions and still survive the trade, could kill 1 minion and possibly face for another 5. otherwise 7/10

Another tech cards, obviously good to trade 1 annoying minion for another (could be good or bad).
but if the owner doesn’t have any other, I’m very sure it will still return the minion.
5/10

With this one and Warlock Upgraded Spell, I’m kinda sad to the power level (or maybe I’m getting used to the fact that former expansion has greater power level).
dealing final 4+4 for 2 mana is better, but not great. At 10 mana, you surely needs a way to answer the threat on board, and this one often not enough.

And if drawn early, it’s just 2+2 for 2 mana, otherwise dead card.
2/10

If Radiance didn’t saw any play, this one obviously won’t neither. 1/10

Good premium value. Won’t disrupt Highlander Deck (if there’s one).
You must be thinking, well Hunter could use this as 3 damage to face directly, but it’s gonna be very slow and dependant on card draws. Besides, with the whole basic/classic removal, I think face hunter gonna be losing most of it’s firepower.
Dragonbane, Kobold Sandtrooper, Leper Gnome (&Sidequest), Eaglehorn, etc.

6/10, will see play just for it’s own stats.

Obviously needs a buff. 4 mana for 1/6 rush is bad value, what’s more, it needs to attack and survive at least 1 damage. Good counter for token board, but 1 damage to minions is not very effective at clearing board, especially at 4 mana which is often too late already.

Buff to 3 mana cost, or at least 2/6 body. Or there’s some frenzy synergy unseen for now. 3/10.

Good tech card. More or less like Loatheb, pending their minion for 1 turn (or more).
It would’ve been more useful if Warlock can somehow return this minion back to hand and play it again.

At most, this card can have synergies from like 3 Nature Spell cards.
I don’t know, it can be added more with miniset and next expansion.
But I doubt it’s significant enough to be included in the first expansion where synergies is low.
2/10 for now.

I think this card is just too slow. Even the best condition at 10 mana only summons 3x 3/2 body which is way too late already. Zoo warlock won’t include this I think.
I could be wrong, since not all cards has been revealed. 2/10 for now.

I wonder how long a game would last if Best of 3 got implemented. I did like playing control deck, and that can last like 1 hour per battle. So, it is possible to get 1 star for a ridiculous 3 hours game?
No thanks.

– “One of the weirest card designs that came up was Battlecry that added 1 to all numbers on the cards”
They did that partially with Embiggen, I mean, the idea is good. Just a bit problematic for low mana cards, since raising 1 mana cost doesn’t always bring the same value to- the card.

– “Designers often have interesting ideas, but they turn out to be too difficult to implement”
Make graveyard a thing already. Use that skull on the right side as a clickable button to view graveyard. And of course, make some card that can interract with it (and not like REZ PRIEST plz).

– “He would also like to try EDH / Commander (MTG format) or a 4 players format in general”
It’s already happening with cards like Goru and Lothraxion, but it’s permanent. In terms, it’s like terrain effect in Yugioh and can be disabled?

for some reason, I think it’s necessary that they give Broomstick nerf ‘give rush to adjacent minions’, and not all minions. But hey, it’s been 6 months, and they still thing broomstick is not problematic.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

hmm, China and their censorship.
it’s already hard enough to create a multi-language Hearthstone, and now Hearthstone afraid to lose it’s Chinese market over some skeleton or ‘other things’ (Jaina oh Jaina)?
It’s bad for the game to succumb to other country’s rules.
When you make the game, why can’t just make it like you want it? Isn’t it the purpose of making a game? *SMH*

I may be wrong, but I guess Panda won’t be a thing for at least another year.
What I really want to see is the roadmap for next year (and the orb teaser for each expansion).

Quillboar, (and presumably Gnoll), we’re about to get a Horde expansion, so anything is quite possible. Even a Tauren Year, Tauren Hero (mentioned on Dean Q&A), and even goes as far as Horde v Alliance.
So it’s not gonna be just Tauren battleground update, but globally I think.
Just wait a few more days.

I don’t know, something sensitive I guess. WC3Reforge would be one I think. Although I am very sure that they’ll just skip rude question. (or most likely)

Submitted, asking about Discarding method, so opponent can’t see it.
And you don’t have to login with your BattleNet ID to submit it, they just ask for your first name and place, meaning you can ask more than one question. This is kinda weird because using ID is more direct for me.
But on the other side, it can help you from getting banned (if you asking it like a jerk maybe).

To this point, I really don’t know what they gonna do anymore. Too much changing to Hearthstone, losing evergreen, Wild goes back to Standard as in full expansion set (or at least similar), it may become Hearthstone 2.0 already for all I care.

We’ll see more in 2 weeks I guess

I was in sarcasm mode. C’mon. LOL

Reverted nerfs means rebuffed. No dust compensation if anyone asking. (Sadly no one asking)
But wait, with the false promise from the last reward track system, I’ll not giving any hype whatsoever.
I need to see the whole picture before I can judge.
There’s too much to take up all at once.
New Expansion, Rotations, Nerfs Reverts, New Core Cards, Blizzcon. I just hope they’re making it for the better and not somehow ruin it and bring more fiasco to the game.
*finger crossed*