Case in point: Mad bomber specified all OTHER characters

It’s still a bit confusing, just add “another” to the card and everybody gets it

But how did it get a 4 star user rating?? It’s so bad

How is this the highest rated card of the set???

omegalul

This is a 5 mana cheaper shirvallah type of card for every class. Though probably weaker, it’s interesting enough for a giant in my opinion.
I mean, if we can have flesh and molten giants we can also have arcane and naga giants.

yeah and late in the game that’s absolutely fine

Because they enter the battlefield when there are favorable conditions for them? Idk, but it’s really not that hard to justify the flavor of summoning giants for cheap

Does it mess it up? If you are apparently willing to discover a Naga, you probably are playing a deck with a lot of spells too because Nagas synergize with Spells so much.
Look at the big picture here and see that it’s really not that different in principle

packfiller, but necessary to establish a baseline of dredge cards

obviously the abyssal curses are so strong that you have to severely overprice the cards to be fair kappa

Basically yeah, I have no idea what people are on with this rating. And before someone says anything about dredge, if you use your few dredge cards on the bottom feeder that’s going to be terrible

The stats are absolutely not good, what are you talking about? That wouldn’t even be good in 2015

It’s obviously just going to be abyssal curses, it’s blatantly obvious.

It is not broken, calm down cassio

So bad, should either not expire or be significantly more expensive, or both. Not to mention that the enablers are too bad

Why is this rated so highly? Doesn’t make sense to get 4.6/5 to me

watch out to not cut yourself on that edge

Sadly there wasn’t

Wow, now we see the colossal minion for hunter, and as expected it’s a beast…. WITH BATTLECRY. Blizzard wants to introduce more beast summoning from deck, having you to jump through all these hoops for that eventual power play, but the one high-end beast from the same expansion which was expected to perfectly fit this one has active anti-synergy with it. And if you play a 4 mana 3/3, play a dredge card for the other one, then play and kill it off too and only summon a 5/5 and two 3/1s then it’s absolutely not going to be a thing.
Idk what the idea was with making a big battlecry beast for hunter when they also wanted to push beast summoning from deck.

But apart from that, you could always summon the other copy, which alone makes it a lot more inconsistent for a general big beast summoning plan. There are just way better alternatives