90 I believe.

I wouldn’t personally use it because it’s only good whenever you don’t have sulfuras, and the quest is easy to complete. While you could hold sulfuras until you have Scourgeland Garrosh, it takes away damage that could be used to end the game. Also very good against Aggro when you don’t keep the quest.

Could*

True but an incredibly powerful swing turn, because this deck couldn’t possibly be viable, and often your not gonna play the DK latent game, where you don’t want to draw into fatigue.

I had a very similar idea. A few minor tweaks here and there but generally the same idea. And I couldn’t agree more, fuck cubelock. I play Spiteful druid with two silences that get the job done with lackeys and voildord. Anyways check out the deck if you’d like. Cheers!

I would recommend you try a gluttonous ooze if you have it instead of a corrosive sludge. Provides armour and a cheaper drop for early game weapons like unidentified maul. I see what your going for with the frostwolf warlord, but the sea giant is a better tempo play that you can even sometimes get off on turn four. The warlord will most likely be silenced because there aren’t a ton of other cards in this deck worth a silence.

I have no idea what rank you are at, but at rank 7, I climbed to rank 3 where I currently rest with this deck. I have a solid 62% win rate with this deck. I run primarily the same list with a Spellbreaker thrown in for those pesky taunts. If you believe that this deck is not viable I would recommend you watch someone like Trump and see his play style and decision making.

Once you find the dust to be able to craft a sea giant, I would HIGHLY recommended doing so. Having a ton of small minions on board, not including you opponents board is huge when you can drop a big minion that is close to the cost of all your other lower stat minions can be game changing. It also helps for taking out medium-large taunts that you would otherwise force to trade your smaller minions.

With the current meta, there are tons of small minions that a 2/3 trades into really well during the early game. Also with the plus three attack when enraged, forces you’re opponent to use resources to destroy it unless they want five extra damage face.

The Kun and Aviana is the way I saw Kripp play it, seems like a more consistent way.

From how I’ve seen Kripparian play it, the goal is to burn through your deck to fatigue, switch decks with your opponent. Azalina their hand, so when they play the card that takes their deck back, you can switch it once more so they’d continue to fatigue.

THIS IS NOT A taunt Druid deck d

Thanks for pointing that out, thought I put one in there