*repeat 2 times

The way it’s phrased makes it seem like it would deal 6 damage just once. Otherwise I’d expect it to say something in the fashion of: “Deal 6 damage to random minion, excess damage hits the enemy hero. Repeat 3 times.”

The dream is 15 damage to the face. Reality is there being only 2 minions, one of which is likely above 6 Health.

Still, the highroll on this is extreme, so I just have to rate it higher just for that fact.

3/5

It’s just a good minion, as such I expect it to see play.

What if a minion trades and both your minion and your opponent’s one dies? Which one does it pick?

It is also kind of protects a big minion because they can’t kill it until they killed the creepy paintings.

I love the design, but I think it might just barely fall short.

3/5

What’s that? 1 Gigantotem is too weak? Well how ’bout 4?

4.5/5

I don’t see it…

But maybe?

3/5

Da Shieldmasta don’t see play, I don’ expect Shieldmasta and 1/1 ould be gud enough. I don’ get why it class card, it be neutral an’ stil see no play ey.

1/5, but it’s a battlecry and we all know what that means…

Of course, the deathrattles druid wants to trigger are more of their strongest deathrattles!

Still, 6 7/6 that does nothing when it’s played? I don’t know man, seems kinda slow…

2/5

The facts:

I want to cheat out 10 mana minions.
At best, this can only cheat out 7 mana minions.
This best case occurs only on turn 10 and later, before that it’s kinda meh.
With a smaller pool of minions to cheat out, it is more likely to cheat out the smaller minions.

Though…

I want to remove worst cards from my deck.
1-3 mana minions are kinda bad.
on turn 4 onwards it can summon those minions.
BUT Battlecries won’t trigger, so it maybe needs some deckbuilding considerations…

4/5

2 damage to a minion is a 1 mana effect at most, so you really want to get the buffs. It’s just too random and too expensive.

2/5

It may actually see some play in some midrange deck that wants to be highly efficient, because 1 extra health can be the difference between removable or not in some cases.

Actually, I’m convinced it will…

4/5

There has to be some way this breaks the game, as all giants do…

5/5

It’s a pretty cool card, though I doubt it compares when you know murloc holmes is coming in the same expansion.

It lacks the 3/4 body and gives 1 less card, but at least it’s guaranteed and offers you multiple options whereas Murloc Holmes decides which cards it gives you.

It is definitely better than murloc holmes in a Harvester of Envy deck, but thief priest probably has too little support currently.

Cautiously optimistic though…

3.5/5

BLIZZARD! If the only minions in my deck are masked reveler x2, does this mean I have infinite damage to minions?

The phrasing of the card doesn’t tell me if it can or cannot summon a copy of another masked reveler, so depending on that…

5/5 if it can
(Surely there’s a fun OTK to be had if it can)

4/5 if it can’t (at least for wild)

Obviously very weak against spells, but damn this minion can hurt a minion-based deck. If a spell-heavy deck can justify playing this, many players will suffer.

2,5/5

This is the card that Harvester of Envy needed to actually do some cheaky stuff. Still, I wonder if a large harvester + stealing some cards play will come too late into the game…

But good on Blizzard for giving the Harvester some support.

4.5/5

I remember a wee little 1/2 slime trying to do the same thing.

2/5

2 mana is not too difficult to slot into a turn, and if it means you’ll remove your opponent’s board, surely that has to see some play?

3.5/5

It’s a taunt, and that’s a pretty large wall for aggro decks to have to get through.
I can see this…
4/5, that is if a secret deck actually sees play.