It’s possible with Paladin, but I mentioned that it wouldn’t be possible with Warrior.

Hey, I’m glad you got it to work and that you like the site!

You claimed the decks weren’t real and I had bots making fake comments! That’s huge accusation to make so of course I was offended by it. Poking a little fun at you in a comment isn’t even close to the level you went to in your baseless comment. There’s a whole thread on Reddit discussing Murloc decks and their viability for defeating The Lich King so it’s not some “gimmicky” deck. I normally don’t respond to stuff like this, but the comment was so over the top that it had to be responded to because you were questioning the legitimacy of the site.

Edit: I’d like to just move on from this, so if you don’t mind I’ll just delete this comment thread. Let me know.

But are you a bot?!

Great!

Thanks! I added it to the list.

While your comment was rude, you did make me want to go test it again. It is significantly harder now. I believe Blizzard hot-fixed The Lich King to make it so he always starts with a follow-up play to his 1-Cost spell. When I played earlier it was significantly easier to snowball the game, but now you have to get a near perfect draw and hope he doesn’t have Blizzard on turn six.

Here’s a screenshot of me completing it with Rogue: http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/rogue-updated.jpg

I also wonder if they made it so you won’t draw Gentle Megasaur in the early game because I played multiple games and while I saw him in my mulligan I didn’t draw him once.

Edit: If Blizzard hotfixed it it’s not every turn one, but it seems more frequent now.

It’s utterly ridiculous that you would think I would post these decks without having actually completed the boss with them. The idea that I have bots posting comments is laughable.

Here are three screenshots of me completing The Lich King with Murloc decks:

Mage: http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/mage-murlocs.jpg
Paladin: http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/paladin-murlocs.jpg
Rogue: http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/rogue-murlocs.jpg

You literally have zero proof of any of your statements and this is exactly why false information gets spread around. I spent the whole day yesterday testing out decks, and I wish I had just found this Murloc strategy instead because I wasted at least an hour or two on Mage.

Warlock can be beaten with just a Neutral Murloc list (you won’t die from duplicates, and you control the board the entire time and don’t take damage): http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/decks/the-lich-king-boss-adventure-aggro-murloc-rogue-deck-list-guide/

I know that feeling, I tried Mage for an hour or two yesterday and couldn’t beat it. Then I used this and beat it on the first try!

You don’t need Murk Eye (replace it with another Murloc) or Hungry Crabs for Paladin, run the Neutral Murloc list: http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/decks/the-lich-king-boss-adventure-aggro-murloc-rogue-deck-list-guide/

Awesome, glad to hear it worked for you!

This is one of the easiest decks to use to beat The Lich King. I’m not sure why you’re having trouble with it because Murlocs beat six out of the nine classes on their own.

I don’t think Pyros is going to make or break this deck. You could probably go with a second Antique Healbot or another Elemental.

Yeah, you can do that but he’ll still have 30 Armor which still makes him hard to beat.

I’d like to add some, but this boss is pretty hard while having a lot of the Wild cards.

I mean Black Knight is a decent craft right now but he isn’t vital. Deathwing is very fringe for the most part, so that’s more of how much you’d want him. It depends if you care about Golden cards honestly, I might not disenchant a golden Thalnos because he gets quite a bit of use. The other two might not see much play, so I’d consider disenchanting those.

More on the cool gimmick side at the moment.

Thanks! No worries, I thought I had explained it pretty clearly in the introduction so I was surprised there were comments like these.

Yeah, I have to admit I thought it was an error when I first saw that too.

Edit: I added a word so it would be more clear.