Kobold Barbarian

Kobold Barbarian Card

Kobold Barbarian is a 3 Mana Cost Rare Warrior Minion card from the Kobolds and Catacombs set!

Card Text

At the start of your turn, attack a random enemy.

Flavor Text

What is best in life? To make candle. To keep candle. To hear lamentations of candle-takers.

Kobold Barbarian Full Card Art

Kobold Barbarian Full Art

Leave a Reply

15 Comments

  1. Maia Hancher
    November 15, 2018 at 11:22 am

    I consider, that you are mistaken. I suggest it to discuss.

  2. Shauna
    November 14, 2018 at 8:26 am

    Beneficial write ups, Thanks.

  3. Crapcrack
    December 5, 2017 at 3:08 am

    Super bad, u can’t control it’s attack.

  4. Distend
    December 4, 2017 at 3:15 pm

    Just so people don’t confuse this as having “Windfury”
    Ben Brode did say on stream that this replaces its regular attack.

  5. Browso
    December 4, 2017 at 2:53 pm

    Quite a swingy minion. You won’t play it in Control Warrior since it’s not the type of card you really want on the build, but on some kind of tempo warrior (which is not a crazy thing) it can be really good.

  6. Bugalicious
    December 4, 2017 at 1:06 pm

    So wind fury, but with one turn being uncontrollable, might be good for control if the first attack can hit the right minions

  7. Me
    December 4, 2017 at 12:43 pm

    Can it attack again after the auto attack?

  8. TurtleHermit
    December 4, 2017 at 12:35 pm

    Isn’t this just reverse power creep on Ogre Brute?

    • guy
      December 4, 2017 at 1:04 pm

      No, because it can attack twice in one turn. Once randomly at the beginning of turn and once as normal. Basically a three mana 4/4 windfury

      • TurtleHermit
        December 4, 2017 at 1:24 pm

        Did they confirm this? The card doesn’t say windfury, so my assumption was the random attack exhausts the minion.

        • Phagocytosis
          December 5, 2017 at 6:57 am

          This turns out to be correct, but I don’t understand why so many people assumed it this way. In my opinion, the card text suggests otherwise, especially when compared to Swamp King Dred. I suppose you’re meant to interpret it as the attack being in your own turn being the relevant distinction? But at the very least that’s not very clear in my opinion.