Gluttonous Ooze

Gluttonous Ooze Card

Gluttonous Ooze is a 3 Mana Cost Epic Neutral Minion card from the Journey to Un'Goro set!

Card Text

Battlecry: Destroy your opponent's weapon and gain Armor equal to its Attack.

Flavor Text

Three time winner of the Un'Goro weapon eating contest.

Leave a Reply


  1. Zenquility
    March 27, 2017 at 2:45 pm

    Rip gorehowl

  2. A-Deg
    March 25, 2017 at 3:44 am

    Cards like this are strange in a game that doesn’t use a sideboard. Will be helpful in a number of games, but the meta isn’t 100% Pirate Warrior or Jade Shaman (if it was, these deck types would be nerfed to death soon). Seeing how streamlined decks are in ranked play, it just feels strange to add a card that is often a dead play, even compared to similar cards. (Acidic Ooze costs less and can increase board presence easier. Harrison has a reasonable body even without his ability doing something.)

  3. Moltar
    March 24, 2017 at 3:06 pm

    Why people like so much being apocalyptic?

    Yes, this card is good vs weapons. Is crap vs any other kind of deck. therefore, not everyone is going to play this.

    The good old acidic ooze is still a good body even when not using the battlecry.

    My 2 cents from an average player that only plays priest.

    • Gluttonous Oozerino
      March 24, 2017 at 3:36 pm

      “A player that only plays preist”


      “..only plays preist”


      Alright guys we know for sure this guy is a troll.

      • Moltar
        March 24, 2017 at 7:16 pm

        One of these days we will be the cancer meta.

        One of these days…

        • Alien
          March 25, 2017 at 12:45 pm

          Your life must be long. It’s like the people who used to use control warrior to climb. I don’t know where you people find the time.

          Get a 51% win rate and just spam aggro all day you’ll become world rank 1 by end of the month

      • Learn to spell
        March 31, 2017 at 10:35 pm

        Learn to spell

  4. Melon
    March 24, 2017 at 12:59 pm

    Yay another ooze, but with more utility.

  5. juansolo
    March 24, 2017 at 8:28 am

    i like this card, they are no gonna kill every pirate card only because is a cancer in the game.

    You can have this in your deck and still loose to aggro pirate, a least you also have harrison jones, the other 2 ozze and the pirate tha reduce weapon, and still you can loose

  6. Enemy
    March 24, 2017 at 7:12 am

    Cool because of all the agro that’s going on right now…
    Now we need an answer to jade

  7. Sober667
    March 24, 2017 at 7:06 am

    Huh ok card a bit bigger oze with small heal attached to it

    • Bling
      March 24, 2017 at 10:27 am

      Well, you destroy their weapon and get back the health you lost when they hit you with it. Against warrior these weapons get very big. So not small at all.

    • Sam
      August 26, 2018 at 9:07 am

      Good and beautiful

  8. bjenssen
    March 24, 2017 at 6:29 am

    This is such a stupid card. Just because they don’t balance they need to print cards like this. A really bad card that immediately wins you the game if you play against a certain deck. It’s exactly the same as the crab. I miss the time when the good decks (patron warrior) were actually hard to play, involving decisions and calculations and it wasn’t based on lucky cards.

    Reno is the exact same. It’s not skillfully played, you either have the card in your hand or you don’t, which is pure luck. Why can’t blizzard stop making these countercards that involve 0 skill and start balancing.

    • Gully1824
      March 24, 2017 at 7:32 am


    • Sylvie Thunder Fart
      March 24, 2017 at 7:42 am

      To draw the patron is also based on luck…. Furthermore, the patron was not a skillfull deck… everyone were able to play it, cause the deck was easy to play/ understand and cheap to build …

      • bjenssen
        March 24, 2017 at 9:58 am

        not really, patron warrior had a lot of draw, which countered the randomness. Now I don’t say that it wasn’t too strong, but it was a hunderd times less cancerous than facewarrior. And yes, it was hard to play. I won more games against it than I lost and I even saw dog miss lethal twice in one tournament game.

      • David
        March 24, 2017 at 11:27 am

        Every pro hearthstone player disagree’s with you.

        • Fry
          March 24, 2017 at 12:38 pm

          Hmm I doubt it. Pro players who have used Patron tend to say that it’s high skill cap is why they loved the deck. Sure, it could be played decently with average skill, but as opposed to pirate warrior (1) it did not play itself, and (2) as your skill and exprince with the deck increased, so would your win rate.

          I never tried out Patron because I was new to the game right before it got nerfed, and I hated it for the time it was viable. However, in hindsight I think it’s very unfortunate that these types of competative high skill cap decks are now almost completely extinct.

    • Tryke
      March 26, 2017 at 1:47 pm

      Seriously……. This game is all about luck. I can win twenty games on the bounce and lose thirty in the next session with the same deck. Its all about what you draw into. Ever played poker? Jeeze….. Skill is not misplaying, that’s it. Not particularly challenging really…… I can’t count the number of games I’ve lost or won off a flukey top deck. Get over yourself…. Get lucky.

  9. jeniok
    March 24, 2017 at 6:15 am

    Rip aggro weapon decks
    The text actually says : gain tempo against a pirate warrior, get your self out of reach, your opponent concedes