You guys have no idea how priest works it sounds… priest cannot make a consistent deck with their current form, what they can do however is make a deck with multiple strong midgame lines that hopefully lead to leads and board control, when that fails they should have a board clear.

sometimes these things do get in the way of each other, thats when something known as “decision making” comes into play.

does that mean that sometimes you’re going to have 3+ cards in your hand that you can’t reliably play? yes, is there a single deck out there in the game where this doesn’t happen? no. Even the most conistent deck, aggro shaman can have an issue where its hand has nothing but doomhammers lightning storms and lava bursts.

are you that dense or just trolling? this isn’t a “completely interactive unfun deck to play where i just clear things and wait for the combo pieces to thaur and win”

it’s patron warrior with a win condition attached to it. win conditions with patron don’t need to do much damage because of how much damage the deck can do if they can’t deal with the patrons

Basically every deck that isn’t 30 cards necessary or entirely face is going to be running Barnes + Ragnaros, kind of sickening

I dont really think this is particularly effective

I don’t get why this is being down voted so much but Barnes is a at his weakest in a Reno deck. The rest why is because Reno decks have much higher amounts of minions than normal decks because they can’t run two copies of spells. This means that all Reno decks are going to have higher chances to get vanilla stats instead of a deathrattle or persistent effect. The deck is still fine though but id take Barnes out for mountain or another spell

no. tiny knight is bad.

pretty sure my version is better than his, but knife juggler doesn’t add much to decks that don’t run tokens. councilman also is slow. wrathguard is scary.

I agree. There is no reason to run senjin over the new healing minion and the loot hoarders have no synergy

elise could be fine, i’ve found justicar to be a liability more often than not

Not at all. it has 4 card draw and 2 discovers with a likelihood of having 3 discovers which puts it higher than most paladin decks for “draw”

tuskarr isn’t worth playing.

2 years? every year it rotates out

swap infested wolf for wolf rider

that works? I still don’t like this card though. if it healed a random ally I think it’d be much more powerful/useful

yes emperor for azure and -explosive shot +UTH

another sea giant. gormok isn’t even good in this deck. even with the battlecry board filling cards he probably won’t trigger often, and he’s an okay statted 4 mana minion.

You shouldn’t even have leeroy in this deck. This deck isn’t good, it doesn’t synergize with discard. I doubt he did any math in making this deck. It’s memed more than it needs to be.

Grinder mage will probably take over tempo mage in a bit, this deck is only a few cards shy of being board clear/removal and large minions lol

Yeah the moroes divine shield synergy was an obvious one to me, I was surprised when people wrote him off so easily. Yes he’s not that good, and yes he’s technically weaker than dreadsteed is, and dreadsteed isn’t played. Paladin and priest can definitely use him. You just need a way to reliably buff him over your opponents board clear and he’s worth it.

The only deathrattle you care about is sylvanas, this is his standard ‘control priest’ build with less heal and n’zoth in its place

museum curators/resurrect can be swapped or 50/50
shifting shade can be reduced to a 1 of if you want to replace it with the healing drop instead (better versus aggro)
you can change 1 cleric for a loot hoarder for reliable draw and to counter aggro more
and a cabal priest can be exchanged for something lower for aggro. i like running embrace the shadows, or shadow madness but the 2/3 taunt with deathrattle could also work.