Zorkthar’s Aggro Face Shaman – Mean Streets of Gadgetzan

Class: Shaman - Format: kraken - Type: aggro - Season: season-33 - Style: ladder - Meta Deck: Aggro Shaman
Learn how to play this archetype with our Aggro Shaman Deck List Guide.

Rate this Deck

Like or Dislike? Take a second to tell us how you feel!


Deck Import


Use the checkboxes to compare up to eight decks!

Leave a Reply


Discuss This Deck
  1. patrikhansen
    January 3, 2017 at 7:30 am

    Replacement for patches?

  2. muaddib4201
    December 9, 2016 at 1:31 pm

    Great deck. Very strong versus pirate shaman and races midrange decks. A timely spirit wolves will stop weapon classes in their tracks. Not great against new reno/kazakus/raza priest. It runs too many removals and without card draw you are stuck top decking then they ooze your doom hammer and it’s gg bc of the free raza heals. Luckily there aren’t too many out there.

  3. Lexiles
    December 5, 2016 at 1:16 pm

    Really strong deck as good as pirate warrior but counters it OP.

  4. Lowchamp
    December 4, 2016 at 9:42 pm

    Think this is a good deck, maybe even the best shaman archetype right now.

  5. Bridiu
    December 4, 2016 at 7:58 pm

    Garbage in the current meta of control decks. Decent against Pirate warrior, and that’s about it.

    • Loop
      December 5, 2016 at 1:13 am

      Yeah looking at his stats he was able to dodge Renolock, which is easily 30% of what I saw today. Feels like an auto loss unless you get a nut draw and the lock has a terrible one.

      • Mad King
        December 5, 2016 at 10:42 pm

        Renolock actually has some issues if you curve out. 4 7/7 after pirates or trogg -> golem start is really hard for them to answer even if they t6 reno.

    • D01tY
      December 5, 2016 at 1:45 am

      What? Its wrecking Jade Druid, pirate warrior and decent against Renolock. The onky matchup i habe problem with is priest

  6. Kay
    December 4, 2016 at 5:15 pm

    How do you bring ur mulligan?

  7. Ctleung321b
    December 4, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    To those that have played the deck, what’s your winrate against face pirate warrior?

    • Ctleung321b
      December 4, 2016 at 4:12 pm

      This deck is good. It beats pirate warrior because pirate warrior can’t race your flamewreath faceless because they don’t have execute.

  8. Ctleung321b
    December 4, 2016 at 4:01 pm

    How is this deck better than face pirate warrior? Pirate warrior usually kills you turn 5. This deck relies on doomhammer and would kill you until around turn 8.

    Look at this guys stats. He must have played the deck at low ranks. He only played against one pirate warrior and he played against weird stuff like control warrior and miracle rogue that are not played at high ranks.

  9. Mvrck
    December 4, 2016 at 3:41 pm

    I don’t have patch but I just went 12-2 with this deck. I misplayed during one of my losses. Face is back!

  10. Maverick
    December 4, 2016 at 1:55 pm

    I’ve tried it for less than a hour: went from 18 rank to 12 with a 14 -0 score. xD And I’m missing “Patches” 🙁
    I agree with ShaolnCowboy, ST Buccaneer is really good 😉

    • ShaolnCowboy
      December 5, 2016 at 7:13 am

      Thanks. Everyone is looking at Pirate Warrior right now as THE aggro deck to play. It’s good, no doubt, but I think there are a lot of classes out there with aggro potential. I have yet to see anyone on ladder play an aggro pirate rogue. Everyone is playing the jade golem or stealth/combo rogues or miracle. A lot of people are trying to play the classes in the old way and not experimenting with the new cards enough or trying to redefine the archetypes.

  11. ShaolnCowboy
    December 4, 2016 at 12:04 pm

    I feel like Small-Time Buccaneer is a second Tunnel Trogg. Massive early game dominance! I might have to try this deck out. I think people will be very salty over this soon. I’m currently running Small-Time Buccaneer + Patches in an aggro Pally deck. No regrets.