Jambre’s Secret Paladin (October 2016, Season 31)

Class: Paladin - Format: kraken - Type: midrange - Season: season-31 - Style: ladder - Meta Deck: Secret Paladin

Rate this Deck

Like or Dislike? Take a second to tell us how you feel!


Deck Import

Use the checkboxes to compare up to eight decks!

Leave a Reply


Discuss This Deck
  1. Rom
    October 11, 2016 at 11:48 pm

    This isn’t “Secret Paladin” deck; this is a “Divine Aggro Paladin”… with 2-3 secrets and the Challengers.
    I’m a fanatic Paladin players, usually I’m playing mostly Paladin decks and few other classes.
    When the “Secret Paladin” released (the original), I found it very powerful. But EVEN NOW, in the “Standard” mode, you people can play a lovely “Secret Pally” deck – a CONTROL SLOW “Secret Pally” deck, as it should be, always.

    I’m playing one of my own, with 2-3 healing spells, the “Healing Regharos”, the “Tyrion” (of course!), two 5-mana divine taunt minions, a couple card-draw minions, all Pally’s weapons, 6-7 secrets (if you want to play “Secret Pally”, you playing with secrets – and you need to “re-fill” them with the second Challenger), etc…

    Generally, Paladin isn’t so popular any more – which is GOOD, they don’t expecting you! All, when they see Paladin, they expecting “Divine Aggro” or “Dragon Pally”. So… give them AGAIN “Secret Thunderstrike”!

    • Khertuzz
      October 26, 2016 at 4:30 am

      @ROM Man can i see your SecretDIN-deck? I’m agree with every single word so i’d like to see a “more” experienced paladin player.

    • Thorfcm
      October 29, 2016 at 10:53 pm

      do u have a decklist?

    October 11, 2016 at 12:40 pm

    This deck is amazing, it’s a hidden gem. I have played 20 games with it and 75% win rate.
    I think I have played against all kinds of decks and it did well against all of them.

  3. StealthhawkJ
    October 7, 2016 at 3:59 pm

    Replaced argent with sunwalker.. very good

  4. Pedroakapetrus
    October 5, 2016 at 6:28 am

    Hi, I ve been playing this deck (or similar version) since 4 month and it gave me good results. Now that abusive sargent got heavily nerfed, do you have any suggestions of replacement?

    I tried to keep them, but they are clearly above their original level. I m trying right now Knife Jugglers instead. Any other suggestion? Thanks.

    • Starboy
      October 11, 2016 at 12:49 pm

      I was thinking about Lance Carrier since it is so similar (in fact the effect is better) but I feel like abusive might still be better because it’s a one drop and fits into more hands. Thoughts?

  5. Anonymous
    September 18, 2016 at 7:56 am

    can i replace the dragon eggs with something?

  6. Nohadon
    September 13, 2016 at 12:47 pm

    It’s not even secret paladin if you’re barely running any secrets, might as well remove the challengers

    • putij
      October 4, 2016 at 1:16 pm

      You don’t need 500 secrets in secret palladin. A turn 6 challenger in this deck is still a good drop, and amazing if you didn’t draw any secrets yet.

  7. Bling
    September 13, 2016 at 12:21 pm

    Whoa no 2 drops at all? Do we know why?

    • Zeroam
      September 14, 2016 at 12:24 pm

      Because paladin has no good two drops. You can play either 2 one drops, play hero power, or if you are on coin, coin a 3 drop.

  8. Bingowinner
    September 13, 2016 at 11:40 am

    no chance against shaman

    • Karma
      September 13, 2016 at 8:38 pm

      ya man good call…top 5 EU..must have dodged all the shamans…. zero chance

      • Rouzeki
        September 14, 2016 at 5:26 am

        If you look at his stats, he had almost 30 games against shaman and close to a 50% win rate.

        The big key to this deck, it seems, is it crushes hunter and warrior which there are a ton of right now (also does well against mage)

        • raptor
          September 14, 2016 at 4:53 pm

          It does not crush dragon warrior. Especially if they have Curator

      • Flameslive
        September 14, 2016 at 5:50 am

        Or maybe the deck is more effective than you predict? Perhaps you would like to post a more “revised” version with proof of legend?