Witchwood Apple

Witchwood Apple

Witchwood Apple is a 1 Mana Cost Common Druid Spell card from the Placeholder set!

Card Text

Add two 2/2 Treants to your hand.

Flavor Text

An apple a day keeps the worgen at bay.

Type
Spell
Rarity
Common
Set
Placeholder
Class
Druid
Cost
1
Spell School
Nature
Minion Type
Mechanics
Add to Hand
Artist
Vlad Botos
Collectible
Yes

34 Comments

  1. nonane

    is the treant one or two mana?

    1. Spirit

      Probably 1 mana, like the 2.2 raven

      1. raven76

        it is 2 mana

        1. raven76

          so it is trash

    2. Taamerlein

      confirmed to be 2 mana

      1. Telim Tor

        confirmed then it's super crap

      2. Killer Lord

        That's a pity, I wanted to try this card in my (wild) token druid (sorry for the ones who hate token druid). But that isn't going to happen if the treants cost 2 mana, such a shame.

  2. Sir Stone

    Most likely two, in which case this is about the same as Ice Fishing.

    1. Nope

      It's more like Razorpetal Volley. Ice Fishing is archetype restricted now that coldlight oracle is rotating.

      1. raven76

        at least the razorpedals costed one mana. for this you get 3 enchanted ravens that don't have beast tag and cost double the mana

  3. crapcrack

    Not good

  4. Ivan

    Really slow... and no strong enough tho

  5. Dessembrae

    Maybe it will see some play in arena.

  6. TheEyeszlade

    So Druid is dead for another expansion , nice balancing bli$$

    1. Psycho

      Really? They have released 1/10th of what's to come and you're already crying!?

      1. Chrys

        Normal rank 25 Players.

  7. CD001

    So... this is essentially an 8 mana Force of Nature that you can theoretically get out 1 turn earlier if you're prepared to blow turns 2, 3 and 4 on it?

    I suppose you could chuck it in a Genn deck with Whispering Woods and Power of the Wild - but I dunno, it seems to be a card looking for a deck at the moment; it'll depend on what support there is for a slower token Druid (with most of the mass-buffs rotating out) I guess.

  8. Odin Goksør

    So now they're trying to make some kind of hand-token-druid...
    It would be pretty funny if this shit actually works considering everybody is shitting on it so much.

  9. Baran613

    I am not a fan of trashtalking this early into the reveal season but bruh, this looks like shiet. Combined with the two epics we’ve seen for druid already we need two amazing legendaries that somehow synergize with these complete garbage cards otherwise druid is not gonna have a good time

  10. serjohn

    could see play in a rank 20 deck , if the treants had taunt maybe , 40 dust otherwise

  11. Soup And Salad

    If the 2/2s were 1 cost minions, this could've been okay. As they are not, this is unlikely to see play.

    I am hesitant to call the "Hand Druid" idea crap since control oriented Druid decks have been successful and most of the tools are still going to be in standard.
    Perhaps if there is a better reward card for holding onto your cards rather than playing them than what was shown in the stream, that card will be a decent follow-up to Ultimate Infesation

  12. Merman

    I think you guys are forgetting the Treants are 1 mana cost. So if you play this on turn two (if you have it in hand), then next turn you can play 3 mana 6/6 worth of stats on the board. Not too shabby but leaves you empty on turn 2.

    1. JayKay

      Nax Treants were 1 mana. All otheres have been 2 mana 2/2 so we can assume that they will be 2 mana.

      https://hearthstone.gamepedia.com/Treant

      1. Merman

        Oh I see now. I was going off the Nax Treants. In that case, the card seems very slow if they will be 2 mana each.

  13. Poster397

    Sure this won’t see play, but! It’s minions that won’t be in the way for “recruit”.

  14. Graphene

    Going second.

    Turn 1 six cards
    Turn 2 seven cards +2 cards (from apple) = 9 cards
    Turn 3 mountain giant (10 cards)
    Turn 4 new full board/ twilight
    Turn 5 savage roar/branching path (dead) or refill board

    The last two steps are optimistic but unless I'm missing something this card allows turn 3 Giants for druid which is very strong. By contrast I'm pretty sure handlock was always turn 4 giants (3 mana).

  15. Blitz

    Give it echo and then we can talk.
    But perhaps with twilight drake and mountain giant, a new kind of dragon giant druid can happen.

  16. Brann

    Idk why people think playing 3 2-2's on turn 3 is weak, in aggro druid this could be super cancer with a bunch of cards druid uses.

    + This could be a card that makes some kind of mountain giant druid tempo deck

    I think people are way underrating the potential of this card

    2-2 trents cost 1 manna

    1. Terrylolol

      The Treants cost 2 mana, not 1.

      1. Dash64

        If you play druid you will realise that treants tokens are 1 mana

        1. WaffleNiNjA53

          Your right. Normally they cost two, but this card gives a different token. They cost two (they said that in the card reveal stream).

        2. Terrylolol

          Nah I don't play that class (not a fan of that crap), I just know how the cards work.

  17. wow

    Come on blizz give Druid some love too... change it back to 1 mana 2/2 treant plzz

  18. MonkyBeast

    Below average

Comments are closed.