Flame Geyser

Flame Geyser is a 2 Mana Cost Common Mage Spell card from the Journey to Un'Goro set!

Card Text

Deal 2 damage. Add a 1/2 Elemental to your hand.

Flavor Text

Oh, a wise geyser eh?

Cards Relating to Flame Geyser

Flame Elemental
Type: Minion - Cost: 1 - Attack: 1 - Health: 2

Flame Geyser Decks

These are the most recent decks that have featured Flame Geyser in the last year.

11 Comments

  1. macrocosm
    March 25, 2017 at 2:57 pm

    this card is really similar to argent horserider or disciple of cthun. for 3 mana, you deal 2 damage, and get a 1/2 as opposed to a 2/1 with horserider or disciple of cthun, which can be better since it won’t die to opposing hero power. Card’s not as bad as people think. might in fact see play in kazakus mage

    Reply
  2. Organis
    March 21, 2017 at 8:48 pm

    For those of you who say this card is garbage, keep in mind the elemental synergies. It’s not supposed to be good on it’s own. If it was it would be broken like Jade Claws and Jade Lightning which were at one point the only 2 jade cards in an aggro deck, as only getting up to a 2/2 with them was valuable, let alone how rediculous they are in a full-on jade deck.

    Of course flame geyser won’t deal 3 damage or summon the 1/2 on it’s own. It’s costed fine. You deal 2 damage, and in exchange for the third damage point you get about half a card (as it’s just a token).

    Reply
  3. DumbEndumber
    March 21, 2017 at 7:29 am

    I guess it’s either a Disciple of C’thun with worse stat distribution and with elemental synergy instead of C’thun buffing, which is playable in elemental decks I guess, or a horrible damage spell on 2 ( though it removes 3/2s – arguably the better 2drop statline) with the added benefit of generating a token for whatever reason. I think it would be better in Warlock, as it would at least provide a discardable token for Discolock or an extra card for handlock, but as it is currently, it needs serious elemental synergy to work reasonably well

    Reply
    • Kalo
      March 23, 2017 at 6:39 am

      elemental synergy is the point of the card, so i don’t see why you’re complaining

      Reply
      • DumbEndumber
        March 23, 2017 at 11:37 am

        Please bear in mind that when I posted this, neither the divine shielded four-drop, nor the shaman legendary were revealed. What I meant was that elemental synergy was weak and lacklustre up then, and stringer elementals were needed in order for this to become a good card

        Reply
  4. Randomking33
    March 20, 2017 at 2:07 pm

    1-2 creature is not great neither is the 2 damage

    if it summons the 1-2 instead of putting it in your hand I think this would be good(maybe)

    Reply
    • Spirit
      March 20, 2017 at 2:20 pm

      Having the elemental in your hand gives you sinergy with the “elementals you played last turn” mechanic, cause you can play the little guy whenever you want, so this card is better than you guys think

      Reply
  5. Immolate
    March 20, 2017 at 1:34 pm

    If only it did 3 damage.

    Reply
    • King Mrush
      March 29, 2017 at 3:18 pm

      That’d be a strictly better darkbomb. And Darkbomb saw lots of play in Zoo.
      That would make this card Frostbolt level, which is ridiculously strong.

      Reply
  6. The Wizard
    March 20, 2017 at 12:56 pm

    Trash

    Reply
  7. Xander Raidon
    March 20, 2017 at 10:23 am

    I might play this just for the Flame Elemental art <3

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Register to keep track of your comments. You can also build and favorite decks!

Comment Policy: Any comments that are overly derogatory will be removed and could result in an account or site ban.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.